<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823</id><updated>2011-11-11T19:41:45.128-06:00</updated><category term='Mark Sanford'/><category term='Eric Holder'/><category term='Massachusetts'/><category term='Scott Murphy'/><category term='Michele Bachmann'/><category term='Jesse Jackson Jr.'/><category term='2009'/><category term='web ads'/><category term='Hollywood Does Politics'/><category term='recall'/><category term='Democratic Governors Association'/><category term='Pat Quinn'/><category term='Creigh Deeds'/><category term='Tom Delay'/><category term='elections'/><category term='Arlen Specter'/><category term='phone banking'/><category term='abortion'/><category term='Norm Coleman'/><category term='Wheelan'/><category term='campaign tactics'/><category term='referendum'/><category term='Antonio Villaraigosa'/><category term='Glenn Beck'/><category term='Ken Salazar'/><category term='Employee Free Choice Act'/><category term='T.J. Rooney'/><category term='Steve King'/><category term='Jon Stewart'/><category term='Jeff Frederick'/><category term='Know Your Third Parties'/><category term='message'/><category term='Tim Pawlenty'/><category term='South Carolina'/><category term='illegal immigration'/><category term='John Cornyn'/><category term='Paul Koretz'/><category term='Roy Blunt'/><category term='Voter ID'/><category term='New York City Council'/><category term='Chris Christie'/><category term='foreign politics'/><category term='Lindsey Graham'/><category term='John Carter'/><category term='Pat Toomey'/><category term='John Thune'/><category term='Rod Blagojevich'/><category term='RGA'/><category term='voting'/><category term='torture'/><category term='stimulus'/><category term='Robyn Ritter Simon'/><category term='global warming'/><category term='AFL-CIO'/><category term='Virginia'/><category term='Joe Sestak'/><category term='U.S. Supreme Court'/><category term='incumbency'/><category term='Joe Lieberman'/><category term='Ben Bernanke'/><category term='holiday'/><category term='GOTV'/><category term='campaign finance'/><category term='Bill Ritter'/><category term='Clarke Hogan'/><category term='Dick Cheney'/><category term='third parties'/><category term='Census'/><category term='Nick Clegg'/><category term='Florida'/><category term='Mark Kirk'/><category term='Peter King'/><category term='Kelly Ayotte'/><category term='Haley Barbour'/><category term='Judy Chu'/><category term='Mitch Daniels'/><category term='Byron Dorgan'/><category term='Millennials'/><category term='emboldened'/><category term='race'/><category term='United Kingdom'/><category term='Richard Johnson'/><category term='new-media'/><category term='Tony Evers'/><category term='gay marriage'/><category term='Paul Krugman'/><category term='Gordon Brown'/><category term='Kendrick Meek'/><category term='DNC'/><category term='David Vitter'/><category term='Eric Garcetti'/><category term='Los Angeles'/><category term='GOP'/><category term='young voters'/><category term='CPAC'/><category term='Iowa'/><category term='Chris Van Hollen'/><category term='gender issues'/><category term='Conservative Protests'/><category term='Roland Burris'/><category term='Joe Wilson'/><category term='Latinos'/><category term='Michael Bloomberg'/><category term='Bill Thompson'/><category term='Rose Fernandez'/><category term='Karl Rove'/><category term='Chicago'/><category term='State Legislatures'/><category term='State Superintendent'/><category term='Feigenholtz'/><category term='21st Century Campaigning'/><category term='Wisconsin'/><category term='Obama'/><category term='Bob McDonnell'/><category term='Lucius Rice'/><category term='David Plouffe'/><category term='Fox News'/><category term='Mitt Romney'/><category term='Sonia Sotomayor'/><category term='Judd Gregg'/><category term='David Hayes'/><category term='9/11'/><category term='Ted Kennedy'/><category term='special election'/><category term='Jindal'/><category term='Ron Klein'/><category term='Terry McAuliffe'/><category term='Arnold Schwarzenegger'/><category term='Bryar'/><category term='New York City'/><category term='Patrick Leahy'/><category term='Jack Weiss'/><category term='Tim Geithner'/><category term='House of Delegates'/><category term='Colorado'/><category term='Nahai'/><category term='music'/><category term='Wisconsin GOP'/><category term='ballot measure'/><category term='Alexi Giannoulias'/><category term='Dick Durbin'/><category term='unions'/><category term='Jimmy Carter'/><category term='NAACP'/><category term='State Supreme Court'/><category term='Paul Ryan'/><category term='Rush Limbaugh'/><category term='Orrin Hatch'/><category term='Alan Grayson'/><category term='Minnesota'/><category term='Robert Gibbs'/><category term='Richard Burr'/><category term='fiscal responsibility'/><category term='health'/><category term='SEIU'/><category term='Meghan McCain'/><category term='party identification'/><category term='gubernatorial races'/><category term='Rick Perry'/><category term='local campaigns'/><category term='campaign ads'/><category term='Mike Huckabee'/><category term='Ben Ginsberg'/><category term='Evangelicals'/><category term='Jim Doyle'/><category term='Howard Dean'/><category term='Tom Cox'/><category term='National Popular Vote Interstate Compact'/><category term='Afghanistan'/><category term='Electoral College'/><category term='Blue Dogs'/><category term='Chamber of Commerce'/><category term='Lisa Madigan'/><category term='Democrats'/><category term='Nancy Pelosi'/><category term='Gallup'/><category term='yard signs'/><category term='Measure B'/><category term='psychology'/><category term='Wisconsin Democrats'/><category term='Barney Frank'/><category term='Louisiana'/><category term='polls'/><category term='Anthony Weiner'/><category term='RNC'/><category term='Devall Patrick'/><category term='John Murtha'/><category term='sports'/><category term='Ethics'/><category term='FEC'/><category term='Grace'/><category term='Michael Bennet'/><category term='Marco Rubio'/><category term='David Cameron'/><category term='NRCC'/><category term='Milwaukee'/><category term='economy'/><category term='Mark Udall'/><category term='Tom Barrett'/><category term='New York State'/><category term='Chris Dodd'/><category term='Lisa Murkowski'/><category term='Wendy Greuel'/><category term='Kathleen Sebelius'/><category term='New Jersey'/><category term='David Vahedi'/><category term='marijuana'/><category term='John McCain'/><category term='Illinois'/><category term='Scott Walker'/><category term='Approval rating'/><category term='Barack Obama'/><category term='Newt Gingrich'/><category term='Al Franken'/><category term='lobbying'/><category term='Andre Bauer'/><category term='Russ Feingold'/><category term='LGBT issues'/><category term='gun control'/><category term='Iraq'/><category term='Janet Napolitano'/><category term='Richard Daley'/><category term='redistricting'/><category term='John Ensign'/><category term='Randy Koschnick'/><category term='Jon Corzine'/><category term='fundraising'/><category term='Rand Paul'/><category term='2012'/><category term='Brian Moran'/><category term='Congress'/><category term='independents'/><category term='socialists'/><category term='Dan Hynes'/><category term='John Boehner'/><category term='Presidency'/><category term='Tim Kaine'/><category term='Diane Feinstein'/><category term='Nevada'/><category term='Chris Simcox'/><category term='Bill Clinton'/><category term='DCCC'/><category term='Islam'/><category term='Bob Bennett'/><category term='recession'/><category term='academic studies'/><category term='George W. Bush'/><category term='David Patterson'/><category term='Kay Bailey Hutchison'/><category term='Jake Knotts'/><category term='California'/><category term='Anne Greenberg'/><category term='Jeff Sessions'/><category term='2010'/><category term='NRSC'/><category term='Rob Simmons'/><category term='Nick Patsaouras'/><category term='David Souter'/><category term='Club for Growth'/><category term='Spencer Bachus'/><category term='Maginnis'/><category term='television'/><category term='birthers'/><category term='Jim Tedisco'/><category term='Iran'/><category term='Why Obama Won'/><category term='ENDA'/><category term='Charlie Crist'/><category term='Harry Reid'/><category term='religion'/><category term='Michael Steele'/><category term='Blanche Lincoln'/><category term='Maine'/><category term='Mel Martinez'/><category term='Bart Stupak'/><category term='Jim DeMint'/><category term='Senate'/><category term='Shirley Abrahamson'/><category term='solar'/><category term='Tom Schieffer'/><category term='volunteers'/><category term='Sarah Palin'/><category term='Eric Cantor'/><title type='text'>What Are You Looking At?</title><subtitle type='html'>A political blog for campaign people, by campaign people.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default?start-index=101&amp;max-results=100'/><author><name>HSG</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08611871243097346223</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>381</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-7162024221168999335</id><published>2011-04-28T12:59:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2011-04-28T13:05:32.571-05:00</updated><title type='text'>New Website</title><summary type='text'>Thank you for reading "What Are You Looking At?" over the years!We are moving the blog to our company website.  To see new blog posts please visit www.HSGCampaigns.com/WAYLA.This web address will stay up for our archived posts from 2008 to early 2011.Thanks again!</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=7162024221168999335' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7162024221168999335'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7162024221168999335'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2011/04/new-website.html' title='New Website'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-5015178690954354151</id><published>2011-04-04T10:04:00.007-05:00</published><updated>2011-04-04T11:40:44.193-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Wisconsin'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='State Legislatures'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='recall'/><title type='text'>The Wisconsin Recall Process and Timeline</title><summary type='text'>Summary: What to know about State Senate Recalls in Wisconsin this year.On Friday, grassroots organizers in the La Crosse area announced they had collected more than twice as many signatures as they needed to recall GOP State Senator Dan Kapanke.Many Wisconsinites, and non-Wisconsinites alike, have been asking about the exact process and timeline for the recall of state senators this year.This is</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=5015178690954354151' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/5015178690954354151'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/5015178690954354151'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2011/04/wisconsin-recall-process-and-timeline.html' title='The Wisconsin Recall Process and Timeline'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-fpJJwpoH2Sg/TZnfjgmXz3I/AAAAAAAAAiY/0o8A7NJTXac/s72-c/WIpols%2Brecall%2Bdates.bmp' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2458910413391091204</id><published>2011-03-11T11:43:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2011-03-11T11:52:47.506-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Voter ID'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='campaign tactics'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='voting'/><title type='text'>What to Know About Wisconsin’s Voter ID Bill</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Important information for voters and political operatives when Voter ID becomes law.The Wisconsin State Legislature will soon be passing a Voter ID bill, and it will be quickly signed into law by Governor Walker.  Just as the recent move to eliminate collective bargaining was meant to reshape the electoral landscape, so is Voter ID.The right-wing in Wisconsin says that voter fraud is an </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2458910413391091204' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2458910413391091204'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2458910413391091204'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2011/03/what-to-know-about-wisconsins-voter-id.html' title='What to Know About Wisconsin’s Voter ID Bill'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2795998390903000780</id><published>2011-02-28T14:49:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2011-02-28T14:59:56.988-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Scott Walker'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Wisconsin GOP'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Wisconsin Democrats'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='unions'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Wisconsin'/><title type='text'>What Losing Unions Means for Democrats</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Why Wisconsin's "budget repair" bill is really about giving the GOP unlimited power.By now, everyone is aware of what’s happening here in Wisconsin.Our newly elected governor, Republican Scott Walker, has introduced a “budget repair bill” that would strip public-sector workers of their collective bargaining rights.Although there are budget-balancing measures in the bill, it goes far </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2795998390903000780' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2795998390903000780'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2795998390903000780'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2011/02/what-losing-unions-means-for-democrats.html' title='What Losing Unions Means for Democrats'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-SgeEMezoUFw/TWwMtcus4cI/AAAAAAAAAiI/SArxbl4IMas/s72-c/wisconsin-protests-unions.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-7739095984228795793</id><published>2010-10-07T13:38:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2010-10-07T13:41:03.214-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='elections'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Wisconsin'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='GOP'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Democrats'/><title type='text'>Editorial: The Difficulty in Facing November</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Dave speaks to the fears that Democrats have moving forward.Taking a look at this blog, comparing this year’s posts to last year’s posts, you can see a burgeoning trend.  Whereas last year I commented much more on Tea Parties, day-to-day embarrassments for the GOP, and Obama’s job approval ratings, I’ve now started talking more about things like the effectiveness of campaign ads and the </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=7739095984228795793' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7739095984228795793'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7739095984228795793'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/10/editorial-difficulty-in-facing-november.html' title='Editorial: The Difficulty in Facing November'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-8452212635093093330</id><published>2010-09-23T12:06:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2010-09-23T12:27:24.902-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='new-media'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='campaign ads'/><title type='text'>Is There More to Online Ads Than Meets the Eye?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: A new study suggests that online campaign ads might be more effective for voter persuasion than previously thought.Last year, we mentioned how some political scientists were beginning to think that campaign ads were going to go the way of the dodo.  We challenged that theory.From the post:“…we’ve mentioned how little beats voter-to-voter contact in spreading a campaign’s message and </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=8452212635093093330' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8452212635093093330'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8452212635093093330'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/09/is-there-more-to-online-ads-than-meets.html' title='Is There More to Online Ads Than Meets the Eye?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/TJuNkg5x1QI/AAAAAAAAAh4/PSuoPkITmG0/s72-c/kelly+study.bmp' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-4187591792527091055</id><published>2010-09-21T11:29:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-09-21T11:32:35.961-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='campaign finance'/><title type='text'>Political Activity Keep the Economy Moving</title><summary type='text'>Hi everyone!  Sorry I’ve been off the map for the past three months or so, I was working a very exciting race in Milwaukee County over the summer and had to take a break from the blog.Now I’m back.I’ll have more on the race I did in the future, but in the meantime I thought I’d share an interesting story I heard on NPR recently.We all know that the United States is going through a rough patch </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=4187591792527091055' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4187591792527091055'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4187591792527091055'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/09/political-activity-keep-economy-moving.html' title='Political Activity Keep the Economy Moving'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-8991404980553175452</id><published>2010-06-02T10:32:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-06-02T10:36:35.676-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Arlen Specter'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Joe Sestak'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='campaign ads'/><title type='text'>Creating a Great Political Ad</title><summary type='text'>Summary: A consultant for Joe Sestak opens up about the story behind a great attack ad.At HSG Campaigns, we like to say that campaigning is both an art and a science.On one hand, there is a very simple, data-driven process which - if applied correctly - can optimize the number of votes a candidate receives in an election.  On the other hand, there is an integral creative process that requires a </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=8991404980553175452' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8991404980553175452'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8991404980553175452'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/06/creating-great-political-ad.html' title='Creating a Great Political Ad'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-1232524555853553532</id><published>2010-05-24T11:53:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2010-05-24T12:03:49.786-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Senate'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Chicago'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Illinois'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Mark Kirk'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Jesse Jackson Jr.'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Alexi Giannoulias'/><title type='text'>Illinois Senate Race Shows Democratic Divisions</title><summary type='text'>Summary: The matchup between Kirk and Giannoulias is looking better for Republicans.For months, Republicans have seen Rep. Mark Kirk (R-IL) as the best chance possible for winning a Senate seat in a liberal state.  For them, the news just gets better and better.Recently, Democratic State Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias has been under fire, as his family business - Broadway Bank - was seized and </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=1232524555853553532' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1232524555853553532'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1232524555853553532'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/05/illinois-senate-race-shows-democratic.html' title='Illinois Senate Race Shows Democratic Divisions'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S_qxTW9ujxI/AAAAAAAAAhk/vpXbWe90DHI/s72-c/kirk+giannoulias.bmp' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-8229196186427835147</id><published>2010-05-19T13:24:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2010-05-19T13:35:38.310-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Senate'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Blanche Lincoln'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Arlen Specter'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Joe Sestak'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Rand Paul'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='incumbency'/><title type='text'>Were Yesterday’s Voters Anti-Incumbents or Anti-Centrists?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Why all the “anti-establishment” rhetoric is only half of the story.Last night, the May 18th Democratic primaries in Pennsylvania and Arkansas were characterized as anti-incumbency elections while the GOP primary in Kentucky was noted - at the very least - for being an anti-establishment contest.In Pennsylvania, five-term Senator Arlen Specter was defeated in a Democratic primary against</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=8229196186427835147' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8229196186427835147'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8229196186427835147'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/05/were-yesterdays-voters-anti-incumbents.html' title='Were Yesterday’s Voters Anti-Incumbents or Anti-Centrists?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S_QuckRndqI/AAAAAAAAAhc/TEolocvhEMY/s72-c/reelecting+incumbents.bmp' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2073302467535201367</id><published>2010-05-10T10:29:00.007-05:00</published><updated>2010-05-10T13:15:46.616-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='David Cameron'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Gordon Brown'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='United Kingdom'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Nick Clegg'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='foreign politics'/><title type='text'>The Aftermath of Britain’s General Election</title><summary type='text'>Summary: The election is over, but what comes next is still uncertain.On Thursday, nearly 30 million Britons - over 65% of the electorate - cast their ballots for a new Parliament after the most exciting campaign in a generation.So far, 649 of 650 seats in the House of Commons have been decided (the remaining seat has a postponed election due to the death of a UK Independence Party candidate, but</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2073302467535201367' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2073302467535201367'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2073302467535201367'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/05/aftermath-of-britains-general-election.html' title='The Aftermath of Britain’s General Election'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S-gneLLo7cI/AAAAAAAAAhU/g5QkW3zTXPo/s72-c/uk+election+results.bmp' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-9003402656502500097</id><published>2010-05-03T13:29:00.009-05:00</published><updated>2010-05-03T13:55:32.487-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='David Cameron'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Gordon Brown'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='United Kingdom'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Nick Clegg'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='elections'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='foreign politics'/><title type='text'>Three Days Left Before the British Elections</title><summary type='text'>Summary: A recap of the UK campaign and predictions for the new Parliament.What a wild ride the British election has been.Before the year began, it was widely expected that the Conservative Party would win the elections, making their leader - David Cameron - the next Prime Minister.By March, however, the Conservative victory was considerably less certain.  It seemed entirely possible that the </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=9003402656502500097' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/9003402656502500097'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/9003402656502500097'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/05/three-days-left-before-british.html' title='Three Days Left Before the British Elections'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S98ZRVxE_YI/AAAAAAAAAgs/te4d2rpnZ_w/s72-c/cam-brown-clegg415.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-5813406786274367553</id><published>2010-04-28T11:50:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2010-04-28T11:54:47.662-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='New York State'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='gay marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='New York City'/><title type='text'>Achieving Marriage Equality, One Campaign at a Time</title><summary type='text'>Summary: A New York State Senate race characterizes the national debate over gay marriage.For years now, the debate over gay marriage has been a defining issue of the modern civil rights push.  For years liberals and moderates pushed back against a GOP agenda that sought to ban the unorthodox arrangement in the U.S. Constitution, as well as in several state constitutions.Today, liberals are </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=5813406786274367553' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/5813406786274367553'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/5813406786274367553'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/04/achieving-marriage-equality-one.html' title='Achieving Marriage Equality, One Campaign at a Time'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S9hoKyHZs_I/AAAAAAAAAgM/8RdZF59aIOM/s72-c/gay+rights+queens.bmp' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-8318940990821273100</id><published>2010-04-19T12:43:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2010-04-19T12:48:28.928-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='campaign finance'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fundraising'/><title type='text'>Midterm Money: What the Fundraising Figures Are Telling Us</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Mixed results for Democrats and Republicans should make for an interesting year.Two weeks ago we noted how the campaign finance reports for the first quarter of 2010 would be something to watch when thinking about how this year’s midterm elections will shape up.Well, the numbers are coming in.  What do they tell us?Democrats Are Falling BehindRepublican challengers in ten of the most </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=8318940990821273100' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8318940990821273100'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8318940990821273100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/04/midterm-money-what-fundraising-figures.html' title='Midterm Money: What the Fundraising Figures Are Telling Us'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-8392268308112092137</id><published>2010-04-12T14:54:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2010-04-12T14:59:29.859-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Democrats'/><title type='text'>A Bad Week for Democrats</title><summary type='text'>When healthcare reform passed, Democrats were convinced their troubles were over.  No more worrying about the midterms - Republicans won’t be able to win on a message of repeal.  No more worrying about a disaffected base - we’ve accomplished something that generations of politicians have strived to accomplish.Except you wouldn’t know it last week.New Gallup polls find the image of the Democratic </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=8392268308112092137' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8392268308112092137'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8392268308112092137'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/04/bad-week-for-democrats.html' title='A Bad Week for Democrats'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S8N7hojfwII/AAAAAAAAAf0/p8YFDYp9D0g/s72-c/cq+senate+projections+4.10.bmp' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2268510083769800032</id><published>2010-04-05T13:55:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2010-04-05T14:02:28.099-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='campaign finance'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fundraising'/><title type='text'>Show Me the Money: First Glimpse into the Midterms</title><summary type='text'>Summary: With the first quarter over, campaigns prepare for a competitive year.A lot of people have enjoyed speculating the outcomes of this year’s midterm elections.  I’ve done it.  You’ve probably done it.  We’ve all done it.This morning I read an interesting post by a liberal blogger who claimed we’re in a “new progressive era” in which Republicans simply won’t win this November.  He claims </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2268510083769800032' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2268510083769800032'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2268510083769800032'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/04/show-me-money-first-glimpse-into.html' title='Show Me the Money: First Glimpse into the Midterms'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-6770393673437376887</id><published>2010-03-29T13:16:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-29T13:21:53.269-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Census'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='redistricting'/><title type='text'>Republicans: The Next Underrepresented Americans?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Anti-government conservatives have been slow to return their census forms.According to an article in the Houston Chronicle today, politically conservative Texas has been behind in completing the 2010 Census so far.From the article:Texas is counting on the 2010 Census to deliver four new congressional districts, four new Electoral College votes in presidential elections, and millions of </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=6770393673437376887' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/6770393673437376887'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/6770393673437376887'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/03/republicans-next-underrepresented.html' title='Republicans: The Next Underrepresented Americans?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2132266777395299319</id><published>2010-03-26T12:13:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-26T12:17:52.919-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Paul Krugman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='GOP'/><title type='text'>Begging for a Reasonable Republican Party</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Paul Krugman articulates what every liberal is currently feeling about the GOP.I was hoping to bring you the final results of the Iraqi election today, but it appears that they haven’t quite finished counting the ballots on time.So instead, I thought you would like to read Paul Krugman’s latest editorial for the New York Times.  Simply put, it puts what every liberal is feeling into </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2132266777395299319' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2132266777395299319'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2132266777395299319'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/03/begging-for-reasonable-republican-party.html' title='Begging for a Reasonable Republican Party'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2774789759142548156</id><published>2010-03-25T11:47:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-25T12:07:45.208-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Senate'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Democrats'/><title type='text'>How Healthcare Reform Can Still Hurt Senate Democrats</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Democrats in the upper chamber will have to defend some indefensible votes this November.As you may have heard by now, the healthcare reconciliation bill will have to go back to the House of Representatives.  The fear among proponents of the bill was that Senate Republicans would offer amendments that Democrats could not pass up, which would automatically mean it would need to go back to</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2774789759142548156' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2774789759142548156'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2774789759142548156'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/03/how-healthcare-reform-can-still-hurt.html' title='How Healthcare Reform Can Still Hurt Senate Democrats'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S6uVEZrMcGI/AAAAAAAAAfU/paeY94RmVuE/s72-c/hcr+senate+cspan.bmp' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-6305926687013779933</id><published>2010-03-24T13:51:00.009-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-29T13:22:18.133-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Census'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='illegal immigration'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fundraising'/><title type='text'>Another Fake Census to Watch Out For</title><summary type='text'>Summary: A conservative interest group sends out a fake census for political purposes.Back in January, the Republican National Committee raised criticisms for sending out a fundraising mailer labeled as an official “census document.”WAYLA has recently uncovered a similar fundraising mailer from the Secure America Alliance, a project of the conservative (or even nationalist) U.S. Public Policy </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=6305926687013779933' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/6305926687013779933'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/6305926687013779933'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/03/another-fake-census-to-watch-out-for.html' title='Another Fake Census to Watch Out For'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S6phcwfirNI/AAAAAAAAAes/42ao887sfMQ/s72-c/phase4census.bmp' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-7738886154202005441</id><published>2010-03-23T13:23:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-23T13:28:04.819-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='GOP'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Democrats'/><title type='text'>How the New Healthcare Law Changes the Dynamics of 2010</title><summary type='text'>Summary: the Democrats’ legislative success means an electoral challenge for Republicans.President Obama finally signed healthcare reform into law this morning.  Soon, millions of uninsured Americans will have access to healthcare, sick Americans will be at lesser risk of losing coverage, and insurance prices will stop skyrocketing.Over the past year, the healthcare debate has changed the </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=7738886154202005441' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7738886154202005441'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7738886154202005441'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/03/how-new-healthcare-law-changes-dynamics.html' title='How the New Healthcare Law Changes the Dynamics of 2010'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S6kIGU1nFNI/AAAAAAAAAek/mR5qpX7BIyo/s72-c/obama+healthcare+signing.bmp' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-4425962515165399758</id><published>2010-03-09T13:02:00.008-06:00</published><updated>2010-03-09T13:13:45.650-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='United Kingdom'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='foreign politics'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='polls'/><title type='text'>Can Labour Still Hold on to Parliament?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: A new poll predicts a slimmer swing to the Tories in Britain than previously expected.I know we blogged about foreign elections yesterday, but the news from the United Kingdom this morning is worth mentioning.  Back in January we noted how many in Britain had come to accept a Conservative Party victory in this year’s elections for Parliament.  Now it’s more difficult to say what will </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=4425962515165399758' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4425962515165399758'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4425962515165399758'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/03/can-labour-still-hold-on-to-parliament.html' title='Can Labour Still Hold on to Parliament?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S5acX2N6DoI/AAAAAAAAAeU/dd7ubUQtRIE/s72-c/tory+labour+poll.bmp' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-7758724524429177601</id><published>2010-03-08T13:32:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-03-08T13:36:32.328-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Iraq'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='elections'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='foreign politics'/><title type='text'>Happy Election Day 2010…in Iraq!</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Iraqis went to the polls today in what is sure to have been a close election.Turnout in Iraq’s elections today were down a bit from 2005 - in which about 76% of the country cast ballots - but estimates show that about 55% - 60% still came to vote.So who was running and who will win?Well, for starters, the dynamic has changed up quite a bit since the last national elections.  The number </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=7758724524429177601' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7758724524429177601'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7758724524429177601'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/03/happy-election-day-2010in-iraq.html' title='Happy Election Day 2010…in Iraq!'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S5VRU6S-_PI/AAAAAAAAAeE/u_4j8D9mN7Q/s72-c/iraq+2005+results.bmp' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-7029177317614783680</id><published>2010-03-05T12:07:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2010-03-05T12:23:48.572-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Michael Steele'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='RNC'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fundraising'/><title type='text'>Will a Controversial RNC Presentation Bring Down Michael Steele?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: An internal RNC document - mocking donors and encouraging politics of fear - finds its way on to the internet and embarrases party leaders.On Wednesday, Politico broke one of the most interesting stories about the RNC of the entire 2010 election cycle.  An internal document - a PowerPoint presentation by the RNC finance staff - mocked their donors and explained how to play to their </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=7029177317614783680' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7029177317614783680'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7029177317614783680'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/03/will-controversial-rnc-presentation.html' title='Will a Controversial RNC Presentation Bring Down Michael Steele?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S5FLhuTrqwI/AAAAAAAAAd0/bGXrY_EtPoQ/s72-c/RNC+slide.bmp' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-672954023653041056</id><published>2010-03-04T12:34:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-03-04T12:37:33.931-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Millennials'/><title type='text'>Who Are the Millennials? (Part 3)</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Wrapping up our short series on America’s youngest generation.We hope you’ve enjoyed - and learned from - our posts this week regarding the Millennial Generation.To wrap up this mini-series, we thought you’d be interested in seeing this PBS report on the Pew study we looked at.And you can find out just how Millennial you are by taking this short quiz!</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=672954023653041056' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/672954023653041056'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/672954023653041056'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/03/who-are-millennials-part-3.html' title='Who Are the Millennials? (Part 3)'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-615593757769901106</id><published>2010-03-03T11:10:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-03-03T11:16:14.073-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='new-media'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Millennials'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='polls'/><title type='text'>Who Are the Millennials? (Part 2)</title><summary type='text'>Summary: The youngest generation of Americans is the most technologically savvy.  Knowing how they communicate and obtain information is paramount to engaging them politically.Yesterday we examined a new Pew Research Center study on the Millennial Generation to find out how they were different from older generation in terms of politics and values.  While we found that there were some striking </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=615593757769901106' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/615593757769901106'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/615593757769901106'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/03/who-are-millennials-part-2.html' title='Who Are the Millennials? (Part 2)'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S46Y1H1TgWI/AAAAAAAAAdc/roI57PRuQlI/s72-c/millennials+technology.bmp' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-161087726133347336</id><published>2010-03-02T14:17:00.007-06:00</published><updated>2010-03-03T10:07:42.371-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Millennials'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='polls'/><title type='text'>Who Are The Millennials? (Part 1)</title><summary type='text'>Summary: How to understand the youngest generation of Americans, and engage them politically.Last year we pointed out the magnitude Americans under 30 had on public opinion.  Not only were they strikingly supportive of Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential election, but also of gay marriage, legalizing marijuana, curbing climate change, and amnesty for illegal immigrants.A new Pew Report finds </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=161087726133347336' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/161087726133347336'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/161087726133347336'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/03/who-are-millennials-part-1.html' title='Who Are The Millennials? (Part 1)'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S41zZzEgacI/AAAAAAAAAdE/MECVvZ1ippY/s72-c/Millennial+Dems.bmp' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-7684427397522977399</id><published>2010-03-01T12:26:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2010-03-01T12:46:58.339-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='sports'/><title type='text'>Prediction Correct: Canada Got Home-Country Boost</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Canada’s Olympic performance verifies that the host country does indeed win more medals than they would without home-field advantage.Around the time the 2010 Winter Olympics began, we did an analysis which found that in eight of the past nine Olympics, the home-country did better than they do on average in terms of both overall medals and gold medals.Now that the games are over, we </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=7684427397522977399' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7684427397522977399'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7684427397522977399'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/03/prediction-correct-canada-got-home.html' title='Prediction Correct: Canada Got Home-Country Boost'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S4wHsstZirI/AAAAAAAAAc8/MnI_mDLcwWY/s72-c/canada_1584707c.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-7524879819593063568</id><published>2010-02-26T11:22:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-26T11:36:24.986-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Congress'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health'/><title type='text'>The Aftermath of the Healthcare Summit</title><summary type='text'>Summary: What the summit means for a healthcare reform bill and the 2010 midterm elections.As promised yesterday, we need to give our wrap-up opinions on yesterday’s healthcare summit in Washington, DC.First of all, the media have not been impressed by what was accomplished yesterday.  I’m not quite sure what they were expecting, but evidently they seemed to assume that the bill would have been </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=7524879819593063568' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7524879819593063568'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7524879819593063568'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/aftermath-of-healthcare-summit.html' title='The Aftermath of the Healthcare Summit'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S4gGckWiNFI/AAAAAAAAAc0/riWXGLPcynI/s72-c/healthcare+summit.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2443018035036932247</id><published>2010-02-25T13:28:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-25T13:30:49.622-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health'/><title type='text'>Healthcare Summit and Getting the Job Done</title><summary type='text'>Sorry this post is so late, as it’s been tough to avert my eyes from the healthcare summit going on today.Watching it reminded me yet again why President Obama was such a wise choice in 2008.  Throughout the day he’s been doing such a great job trying to put politics aside and hash out policy.Perhaps nowhere was it more obvious then during an exchange that’s making headlines right now with his </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2443018035036932247' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2443018035036932247'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2443018035036932247'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/healthcare-summit-and-getting-job-done.html' title='Healthcare Summit and Getting the Job Done'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2002531165801363346</id><published>2010-02-24T16:10:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-24T16:13:21.719-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fiscal responsibility'/><title type='text'>Editorial: Can’t We Just Get the Job Done?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Eric and Dave explain their frustrations with the politics of pessimism.It’s not difficult to be pessimistic about the outlook of the world sometimes.  In recent years, it hasn’t been difficult to be pessimistic about the future of the United States.  For liberals, many of us made the claim that we would move to Canada following the re-election of George W. Bush.  In our knee-jerk </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2002531165801363346' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2002531165801363346'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2002531165801363346'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/editorial-cant-we-just-get-job-done.html' title='Editorial: Can’t We Just Get the Job Done?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-1468462321044272893</id><published>2010-02-23T15:13:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-23T15:15:39.253-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Gallup'/><title type='text'>Troubling Indicators for Democrats in 2010</title><summary type='text'>Gallup has started listing “Election 2010 Key Indicators” on their politics page.  Two of these indicators might be troubling for Democrats.First, they find a 12-point enthusiasm gap between Republicans and Democrats.  We’ve mentioned this general trend before, but it is nice to have measured figures on it for once.  I happen to think we can close that gap, but it won’t be easy.Second, they find </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=1468462321044272893' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1468462321044272893'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1468462321044272893'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/troubling-indicators-for-democrats-in.html' title='Troubling Indicators for Democrats in 2010'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S4RFM7knjXI/AAAAAAAAAcs/uDHvS9Ohumw/s72-c/2010+election+indicators.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-576308126847981301</id><published>2010-02-22T12:50:00.006-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-22T12:57:08.916-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='campaign tactics'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='message'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fiscal responsibility'/><title type='text'>The Healthcare-Deficit Connection</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Explaining the real impact of healthcare reform on our deficits to the American voter.Hale “Bonddad” Stewart had a good post at FiveThirtyEight.com over the weekend exploring the details of the federal budget.  It clearly spelled out one factor of government spending that many of us have known about for a long time: the connection between our country’s rapidly inflating healthcare costs </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=576308126847981301' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/576308126847981301'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/576308126847981301'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/healthcare-deficit-connection.html' title='The Healthcare-Deficit Connection'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S4LTPbz5NpI/AAAAAAAAAcc/PXqMW-H_TI4/s72-c/mandatory+discretionary.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-123338145315233923</id><published>2010-02-19T16:34:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-19T16:39:03.281-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='message'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CPAC'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='GOP'/><title type='text'>CPAC All Over the Place</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Just when it appeared conservatives were coming to a cohesive message, their annual conference produces a strange and wide array of views.Following the political blogs today, one can’t help but see a lot of coverage of the Conservative Political Action Conference.  One thing I couldn’t help but notice is the lack of collective discipline in message.Politico reported today that “less than</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=123338145315233923' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/123338145315233923'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/123338145315233923'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/cpac-all-over-place.html' title='CPAC All Over the Place'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-6990108340364410702</id><published>2010-02-18T16:45:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-18T16:51:03.586-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='sports'/><title type='text'>Being the Home Country Increases Your Olympic Medals</title><summary type='text'>Summary: A data analysis of the past nine Olympics finds one reason teams want the games in their home countries.I know this isn’t strictly political, but hopefully it discourages the sort of partisanship over sports we saw when Republicans cheered Chicago’s bid-loss for the 2016 Summer Olympics.While watching curling, I noticed that the vast majority of cheering from the crowd was for Canada.  </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=6990108340364410702' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/6990108340364410702'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/6990108340364410702'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/being-home-country-increases-your.html' title='Being the Home Country Increases Your Olympic Medals'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S33Dsva8qhI/AAAAAAAAAcM/PSWG91NPse4/s72-c/home+bump+olympics.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-7160315117375508960</id><published>2010-02-17T12:45:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-17T12:48:41.532-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Senate'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='campaign ads'/><title type='text'>Could This Be the Worst Campaign Ad Ever?</title><summary type='text'>Some of you have probably seen this by now, but if not, it’s time you did.  Carly Fiorina’s senate campaign in California recently released this ad attacking her GOP primary opponent, Rep. Tom Campbell, via FCINO.com.It’s hilariously bad.  So bad that you may want to stop watching it half-way through.  But I guarantee you’ll want to watch it through the end.Now, in fairness, this was a web-ad </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=7160315117375508960' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7160315117375508960'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7160315117375508960'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/could-this-be-worst-campaign-ad-ever.html' title='Could This Be the Worst Campaign Ad Ever?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-8041625056379051090</id><published>2010-02-16T13:57:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-16T14:07:54.282-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Scott Walker'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Wisconsin'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tom Barrett'/><title type='text'>Why the Barrett Campaign Can Win in November</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Tom Barrett’s gubernatorial campaign in Wisconsin applies new and traditional techniques alike to defy the odds in 2010.I can’t really count how many times now I’ve said on this blog that Democrats will have a rough year in 2010.  Across the country, the GOP looks poised to retake offices up and down the ticket.In Wisconsin, two Republican candidates – Milwaukee County Executive Scott </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=8041625056379051090' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8041625056379051090'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8041625056379051090'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/why-barrett-campaign-can-win-in.html' title='Why the Barrett Campaign Can Win in November'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S3r6mBUNbSI/AAAAAAAAAcE/sNdq05tGvDA/s72-c/428px-Tom_Barrett.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-5166098587186116344</id><published>2010-02-15T11:54:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-15T11:59:25.866-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='volunteers'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='voting'/><title type='text'>How Do Volunteers Help a Campaign?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Exploring how, exactly, volunteers help win elections.The answer to this question may seem all-too obvious for most readers, but according to a new post by our friends at Activate, it shouldn’t be.The old-school way of viewing that question, according to them, is that “the volunteer influence merely displaces some of the phoning or canvassing that the campaign plans to outsource at the </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=5166098587186116344' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/5166098587186116344'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/5166098587186116344'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/how-do-volunteers-help-campaign.html' title='How Do Volunteers Help a Campaign?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-1109712813133620609</id><published>2010-02-11T13:23:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-11T13:35:32.975-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tim Pawlenty'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Sarah Palin'/><title type='text'>A Look at Silver’s Analysis of Palin-2012</title><summary type='text'>Summary: FiveThirtyEight.com’s Nate Silver explores Sarah Palin’s 2012 presidential primary chances, but leaves out an important variable.For those who haven’t seen it yet, Nate Silver’s analysis of Palin’s 2012 chances is quite interesting.  While long and in-depth, he makes some good points.From the post:So where is Palin likely to run strongest? Obviously, it would depend on the candidates </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=1109712813133620609' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1109712813133620609'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1109712813133620609'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/look-at-silvers-analysis-of-palin-2012.html' title='A Look at Silver’s Analysis of Palin-2012'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S3Rbg2l6YWI/AAAAAAAAAbs/E7I0RGdlCDM/s72-c/palin+2012.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2502033419045056219</id><published>2010-02-10T16:03:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-10T16:07:16.097-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='campaign tactics'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='RNC'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='message'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fundraising'/><title type='text'>How Democrats Can Claim Fiscal Responsibility for Themselves</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Democrats have an opportunity to turn a core Republican message back on them.Over the past year or so, Republicans in Washington have been quick to criticize the spending coming out of Congress with the blessing of the Obama Administration.Knowing full well that most Americans are adverse to deficits (which are now higher than ever before) the GOP is calling Democrats “out of touch” with</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2502033419045056219' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2502033419045056219'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2502033419045056219'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/how-democrats-can-claim-fiscal.html' title='How Democrats Can Claim Fiscal Responsibility for Themselves'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-416411939338583241</id><published>2010-02-09T13:26:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-09T13:33:11.802-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='John Murtha'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='special election'/><title type='text'>Who Will Replace John Murtha?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Following the death of Congressman Murtha (D-PA), candidates prepare for a competitive special election.Last night, the powerful Democratic Congressman from Pennsylvania’s 12th district – John Murtha – died of complications during gallbladder surgery.  He was 77.Murtha was first elected in 1974 during a special election in the midst of the Watergate scandal.  One of the first Vietnam War</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=416411939338583241' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/416411939338583241'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/416411939338583241'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/who-will-replace-john-murtha.html' title='Who Will Replace John Murtha?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S3G4CL6yC7I/AAAAAAAAAbc/_qiPU11kqnE/s72-c/john-murtha-1108-lg-22406403.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2315150090679195658</id><published>2010-02-08T13:30:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-08T13:43:27.203-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='sports'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='campaign ads'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Evangelicals'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='religion'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='abortion'/><title type='text'>What Was the Point of the Tim Tebow Superbowl Ad?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Dave analyzes the effectiveness of what was supposed to be a controversial ad-buy.For weeks the news and sports media in the U.S. hyped up the Superbowl ad featuring Tim Tebow and sponsored by Focus on the Family – a conservative pro-life organization.It shocked a lot of people to think that CBS would allow a politically and religiously-charged issue like abortion to interfere with the </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2315150090679195658' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2315150090679195658'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2315150090679195658'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/what-was-point-of-tim-tebow-superbowl.html' title='What Was the Point of the Tim Tebow Superbowl Ad?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-4756972959799150227</id><published>2010-02-04T14:14:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-04T14:17:22.320-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><title type='text'>Which States Are Most Blue?  Which States Are Most Red?</title><summary type='text'>Gallup and Politico have some cool new maps to browse over for those of us watching the political landscape this year.First, Gallup has a new “State of the States” page in which you can see what states most identify as Republican, Democratic, conservative, moderate, and liberal.Overall, the Democrats are still more popular in the minds of the voters than Republicans.  49% of those polled identify</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=4756972959799150227' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4756972959799150227'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4756972959799150227'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/which-states-are-most-blue-which-states.html' title='Which States Are Most Blue?  Which States Are Most Red?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S2sq8AnIrmI/AAAAAAAAAbU/n36R09-lyZA/s72-c/Dem+vs+GOP+Map.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-3952350714236396174</id><published>2010-02-03T11:45:00.007-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-06T14:05:19.724-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Approval rating'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='polls'/><title type='text'>Did the SOTU Address Bump Obama’s Approval Rating?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: The State of the Union Address did help President Obama - but by how much, and will it last?A week ago today President Obama delivered his first State of the Union Address.  Earlier that day we asked “could it bump his approval rating?”We looked at Gallup data from previous SOTU speeches and determined it was unlikely.  Presidents rarely get a significant bump following their annual </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=3952350714236396174' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/3952350714236396174'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/3952350714236396174'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/did-sotu-address-bump-obamas-approval.html' title='Did the SOTU Address Bump Obama’s Approval Rating?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S2m3Gnk95xI/AAAAAAAAAbM/73nc-CYTU0Q/s72-c/Obama+Approval+Jump+SOTU.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2551830757731200518</id><published>2010-02-02T12:57:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-02T13:24:05.322-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='message'/><title type='text'>Why the Smarter Candidates Aren’t Always the Better Politicians</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Having the facts on your side is never enough - what Democrats need to know for 2010.Democrats will be tempted this year to explain the healthcare debate - or eventually the healthcare bill - in terms of economic efficiencies and aggregate improvements.These will, of course, be the results of such a bill - but the argument may still cost these Democrats their elections.Dr. David Runciman</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2551830757731200518' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2551830757731200518'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2551830757731200518'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/why-smarter-candidates-arent-always.html' title='Why the Smarter Candidates Aren’t Always the Better Politicians'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S2h7ozbOzEI/AAAAAAAAAbE/CdvolgSA-No/s72-c/david+runciman.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-1509645809512294650</id><published>2010-02-01T12:06:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-01T12:11:31.125-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='campaign tactics'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><title type='text'>Why a Strong Volunteer Base is Critical in 2010</title><summary type='text'>Another Democratic consulting firm has started blogging!  This time it’s Activate, a direct voter contact firm in Washington, DC.Recently, Founder and CEO Mark Sump wrote about the importance of volunteer outreach and direct voter contact.From The New Paradigm in Poltics:The media is of course singularly focused on recent Democratic Party failures in Virginia, New Jersey and, of course, </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=1509645809512294650' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1509645809512294650'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1509645809512294650'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/02/why-strong-volunteer-base-is-critical.html' title='Why a Strong Volunteer Base is Critical in 2010'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-7444199028512300474</id><published>2010-01-29T11:44:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-29T11:50:07.683-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><title type='text'>Thoughts on Wednesday’s SOTU Address</title><summary type='text'>On Wednesday, President Barack Obama gave his first State of the Union Address.  To put it mildly, he delivered one of his best speeches to date.Watch the full speech here:It was folksy, compassionate, and at times humorous.  Most importantly, it was moving.Some in the blogosphere - from both left and right - have been quick to criticize the feeling of the speech, if not the substance.  Arianna </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=7444199028512300474' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7444199028512300474'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7444199028512300474'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/thoughts-on-wednesdays-sotu-address.html' title='Thoughts on Wednesday’s SOTU Address'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-3916993502182828690</id><published>2010-01-27T13:32:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-28T12:58:47.669-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='sports'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='religion'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='abortion'/><title type='text'>Sports and Ideology - An Uneasy Intersection</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Laura Craft Hogensen explains her frustration with Tim Tebow's pro-life ad that will air during the Superbowl.For many Americans, Sunday is a day of worship, a day to attend church services, a day of prayer and reflection.  For the past decade, the Gallup Poll has shown that about 40% of people in this country attend some sort of church service during the weekend.  Though this number has</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=3916993502182828690' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/3916993502182828690'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/3916993502182828690'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/sports-and-ideology-uneasy-intersection.html' title='Sports and Ideology - An Uneasy Intersection'/><author><name>HSG</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08611871243097346223</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S2HeSmrkjVI/AAAAAAAAAa8/nU8E8vEHTwY/s72-c/tim+tebow.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-3357547497215988207</id><published>2010-01-27T12:23:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-27T12:29:56.970-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='polls'/><title type='text'>Can SOTU Address Bump Obama’s Approval Ratings?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Tonight's address will set the stage for 2010 -- but how will if affect Obama's ratings?Tonight President Obama will deliver his first State of the Union Address, although he has already addressed Congress twice before.  According to pundit Howard Fineman, Obama’s test tonight will be whether or not he can win back America’s confidence.His approval ratings could be worse, but they do </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=3357547497215988207' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/3357547497215988207'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/3357547497215988207'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/can-sotu-address-bump-obamas-approval.html' title='Can SOTU Address Bump Obama’s Approval Ratings?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S2CFSSiWgJI/AAAAAAAAAak/gL_8gKfg5YQ/s72-c/obama+approval+jan10.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-434939817107015399</id><published>2010-01-26T13:53:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-26T14:07:33.571-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Massachusetts'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='special election'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='campaign tactics'/><title type='text'>What Was Learned in Massachusetts?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Fellow political consultants provide critical, but reassuring insight following the Senatorial special election in the Bay State.Recently, our colleagues at Zata3 - a Democratic consulting firm in Washington, DC - sent us an email titled “Sorting Through the Wreckage Massachusetts.”The email contained some important lessons from last week’s special election that we thought would be good </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=434939817107015399' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/434939817107015399'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/434939817107015399'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/what-was-learned-in-massachusetts.html' title='What Was Learned in Massachusetts?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-5509434582897495060</id><published>2010-01-25T11:39:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-25T12:45:10.341-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='David Plouffe'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Democrats'/><title type='text'>Can David Plouffe Save Democrats Come November?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: With this year's midterm elections scaring Democrats, David Plouffe takes the wheel and offers some advice.Over the weekend it was reported that President Obama is taking a centralizing role in the 2010 elections for the Democratic Party.  In order for his party to hold on to seats in the midterms he is reassembling the team that pushed him through the primaries and sent him to the oval </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=5509434582897495060' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/5509434582897495060'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/5509434582897495060'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/can-david-plouffe-save-democrats-come.html' title='Can David Plouffe Save Democrats Come November?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S13Y90ovT_I/AAAAAAAAAac/-N1HP5ZDAyQ/s72-c/David+Plouffe.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-8552322518578076732</id><published>2010-01-22T12:41:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-22T12:59:32.339-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='campaign finance'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='U.S. Supreme Court'/><title type='text'>How Will Yesterday’s Supreme Court Decision Affect 2010 Elections?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Show me the money!  2010 and the Supreme Court.As you probably know by now, the Supreme Court yesterday overturned decades of precedent by ruling that a century-old law forbidding corporate (and possibly labor union) funding of political campaigns was unconstitutional.  The issue, they claimed, was that the law infringed on free speech as protected by the First Amendment.We first </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=8552322518578076732' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8552322518578076732'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8552322518578076732'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/how-will-yesterdays-supreme-court.html' title='How Will Yesterday’s Supreme Court Decision Affect 2010 Elections?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S1n1gCbOlzI/AAAAAAAAAaU/05o-atRxrVI/s72-c/get+rolled+DC.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-175422626482135321</id><published>2010-01-21T18:07:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-21T18:14:34.465-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Massachusetts'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Democrats'/><title type='text'>Editorial: Why Brown’s Victory is Not the End of the World</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Dave and Eric at WAYLA ponder the impact of the special election in Massachusetts.Tuesday’s election in the Bay State sent a Republican to fill Ted Kennedy’s former seat.  Needless to say, it’s been considered a devastating blow to President Obama and the Democratic Party.To be sure, things would certainly be easier for the Democrats if they had a filibuster-proof Senate, capable of </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=175422626482135321' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/175422626482135321'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/175422626482135321'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/editorial-why-browns-victory-is-not-end.html' title='Editorial: Why Brown’s Victory is Not the End of the World'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-3087934218303710506</id><published>2010-01-20T12:37:00.007-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-20T12:49:19.213-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Massachusetts'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='special election'/><title type='text'>Some Thoughts on the Massachusetts Senate Race</title><summary type='text'>Summary: A lesson for Democrats in 2010 - 3 Reasons Coakley lost in Massachusetts.As promised, we’ll spend today analyzing some key reasons why a Republican won Ted Kennedy’s seat in the U.S. Senate yesterday.  Essentially, there are a variety of things to look at despite the lack of exit polls.Campaigning MattersThere’s been a lot of back-and-forth bickering among Democrats over who is to blame </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=3087934218303710506' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/3087934218303710506'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/3087934218303710506'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/some-thoughts-on-massachusetts-senate.html' title='Some Thoughts on the Massachusetts Senate Race'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S1dOGWP7GmI/AAAAAAAAAZ8/xs-AUOtOmLA/s72-c/brown+coakley.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2229700868399559598</id><published>2010-01-19T19:31:00.009-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-19T20:51:30.483-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Massachusetts'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='special election'/><title type='text'>Tough Massachusetts Race Comes to a Close</title><summary type='text'>Welcome back to WAYLA for our coverage of today’s special election in Massachusetts.  Polls have closed and our eye is glued to the results as they slowly come.The Bay State saw huge turnout today - which may be of greater benefit to Republican Scott Brown than Democrat Martha Coakley.Early returns show Brown ahead 53% to 46%, according to CNN - but that’s only with 13% of the vote in.  Obviously</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2229700868399559598' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2229700868399559598'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2229700868399559598'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/tough-massachusetts-race-comes-to-close.html' title='Tough Massachusetts Race Comes to a Close'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S1ZucBZAQ9I/AAAAAAAAAZ0/IGW5dOyjyeU/s72-c/globe+coakley+brown.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-8046252507681611042</id><published>2010-01-19T12:58:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-19T14:17:48.454-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Senate'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Massachusetts'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='special election'/><title type='text'>All Political Eyes on Massachusetts</title><summary type='text'>With hours left before polls close in the Bay State, political junkies, insiders, and the press are looking forward to what are expected to be close results.We’ll be blogging during the returns tonight, but for the meantime, here are some good articles on the race…• “Finger-Pointing Begins for Democratic Insiders” (Politico): Nervous Democrats have already begun to blame one another for putting </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=8046252507681611042' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8046252507681611042'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8046252507681611042'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/all-political-eyes-on-massachusetts.html' title='All Political Eyes on Massachusetts'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-8551385178373552558</id><published>2010-01-18T11:26:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-18T11:28:32.070-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='holiday'/><title type='text'>Happy MLK Day!</title><summary type='text'>We’re taking a day off from the blog to spend some time giving back to the community today.  We hope you get a chance to do some service too.  MLK Day is a great day to help our country in the most basic of ways.Even if you can’t today, you will have an opportunity to help the victims of the earthquake in Haiti - so long as you’re in the Milwaukee area tomorrow.Or if you won’t be in Milwaukee </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=8551385178373552558' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8551385178373552558'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8551385178373552558'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/happy-mlk-day.html' title='Happy MLK Day!'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S1SZ-b3TJUI/AAAAAAAAAZs/C3gcnBwBW0U/s72-c/Haiti2.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-4345319951956454596</id><published>2010-01-15T12:01:00.006-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-15T12:27:42.596-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Massachusetts'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='special election'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='campaign ads'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='polls'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='GOTV'/><title type='text'>Nail-Biter in Massachusetts</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Will party unity be able to bring another win for the GOP in a traditionally Democratic State, or can Coakley secure Ted Kennedy's seat on Tuesday?So far this blog has not really given any insight to the unexpectedly close special election for Senator in Massachusetts.  It would be irresponsible if we let that continue.  So here’s a little breakdown of what to watch for in the race.First</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=4345319951956454596' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4345319951956454596'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4345319951956454596'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/nail-biter-in-massachusetts.html' title='Nail-Biter in Massachusetts'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S1CuqyBQKsI/AAAAAAAAAZk/xyJix1C-xRs/s72-c/Mass+Senate+Polls.png' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-6885206321539796008</id><published>2010-01-14T13:33:00.007-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-15T12:07:39.621-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='NRCC'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Chris Van Hollen'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='GOP'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Eric Cantor'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Democrats'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='DCCC'/><title type='text'>GOP and Democrats Lay Out 2010 Plans to Control the House</title><summary type='text'>Summary: As the Democrats and Republicans lay out their 2010 strategy, who will need a miracle to reach their goal?Following a strategy session in Annapolis this week, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) laid out the GOP’s plans to retake the lower chamber.First and foremost they will use what they call the “80-20 strategy” which basically calls for attacking Democrats on the stimulus, </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=6885206321539796008' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/6885206321539796008'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/6885206321539796008'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/gop-and-democrats-lay-out-2010-plans-to.html' title='GOP and Democrats Lay Out 2010 Plans to Control the House'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S09zq_iq6yI/AAAAAAAAAZU/TO_PeYXZRLo/s72-c/cantor+van+hollen.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-7874901852412116504</id><published>2010-01-13T12:45:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-13T12:52:40.464-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Blanche Lincoln'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Bart Stupak'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Glenn Beck'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Democrats'/><title type='text'>Recent Developments Confirming 2010 Political Trends…</title><summary type='text'>Three articles - all from Politico - today seem to give weight to important trends we’ve been discussing looking forward to the 2010 midterm elections.Irritated Arkansas LiberalsWe’ve been talking quite a lot about the unsatisfied liberal base of the Democratic Party, and how it may be the greatest threat to Democratic candidates this year.  Nowhere is this more evident - apparently - than in </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=7874901852412116504' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7874901852412116504'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7874901852412116504'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/recent-developments-confirming-2010.html' title='Recent Developments Confirming 2010 Political Trends…'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S04V9gOWSNI/AAAAAAAAAY8/RLkm8mY5WaU/s72-c/blanche+lincoln.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-4047226350069775595</id><published>2010-01-12T11:20:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-12T11:24:34.666-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Jon Stewart'/><title type='text'>Can One Political Party Simply Be Better on a Particular Issue?</title><summary type='text'>Ever mindful of the fact that we often take ourselves too serious in politics, I thought it would be good to show you this insightful and hilarious segment from last night's Daily Show today...The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10cFright Clubwww.thedailyshow.comDaily Show Full EpisodesPolitical HumorHealth Care Crisis</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=4047226350069775595' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4047226350069775595'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4047226350069775595'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/can-one-political-party-simply-be.html' title='Can One Political Party Simply Be Better on a Particular Issue?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-1563433152547164615</id><published>2010-01-11T12:50:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-11T13:01:01.973-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='sports'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Harry Reid'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Michael Steele'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Sarah Palin'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Bill Clinton'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Rod Blagojevich'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='polls'/><title type='text'>Weekend Political Roundup</title><summary type='text'>Summary: This weekend was full of brash comments from politicians--read who's getting into trouble.This past weekend was somewhat unusual for me insofar as I was not keeping track of the news.  Instead I was mostly watching the NFL playoffs, which I’ll briefly talk about later in the post.  Needless to say, when I checked the news this morning, I was surprised by just how much happened in the </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=1563433152547164615' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1563433152547164615'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1563433152547164615'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/weekend-political-roundup.html' title='Weekend Political Roundup'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-1627205881265658591</id><published>2010-01-08T13:01:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-08T13:04:47.739-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fundraising'/><title type='text'>Fundraising Starts to Pick Up for 2010 Elections</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Tracking the money at an important fundraising stage.With this year’s midterm elections 11 months away, campaigns and party organizations are focusing on one thing: money.We start in Florida where 8th District Democratic Congressman Alan Grayson raised a whopping $850,000 in the fourth quarter last year, bringing his cash-on-hand to over $1 million already.  This was largely due to his </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=1627205881265658591' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1627205881265658591'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1627205881265658591'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/fundraising-starts-to-pick-up-for-2010.html' title='Fundraising Starts to Pick Up for 2010 Elections'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-3295023905309496442</id><published>2010-01-07T14:46:00.006-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-07T15:01:52.375-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='David Cameron'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='United Kingdom'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='foreign politics'/><title type='text'>The 2010 Elections - in Britain!</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Conservatives expect to take down Labour in this year's UK elections - but can American poltiical consultants change the dynamic?You can rest assured that we’ll be following this year’s midterm elections in the U.S. with a close eye.  But we’ll also be following a very pivotal General Election in the United Kingdom, which could shift the balance of power in our close ally’s realm.Lately,</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=3295023905309496442' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/3295023905309496442'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/3295023905309496442'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/2010-elections-in-britain.html' title='The 2010 Elections - in Britain!'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S0ZKA7KfSVI/AAAAAAAAAYs/bA2v8h-Y35o/s72-c/DigitalHousesOfParliament.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-949090373333648123</id><published>2010-01-06T12:51:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-06T13:26:59.135-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Byron Dorgan'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Chris Dodd'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='redistricting'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Bill Ritter'/><title type='text'>How the Recent Retirements Will Shake Things Up</title><summary type='text'>Summary: As Dorgan, Dodd, and Ritter announce their plans to retire, the Democratic Party may stand to lose more races up and down the ticketLast night it was reported that Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND) will retire this year, leaving an open seat in the Roughrider State.This was unquestionably bad news for Democrats.  Dorgan was able to hold on to the seat solely based on the incumbency effect - </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=949090373333648123' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/949090373333648123'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/949090373333648123'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/how-recent-retirements-will-shake.html' title='How the Recent Retirements Will Shake Things Up'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/S0Tekg2OL5I/AAAAAAAAAYc/diawkJH3mV4/s72-c/Democratic+retirements.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-5147295283444248692</id><published>2010-01-05T12:14:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-05T12:17:41.668-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='new-media'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='web ads'/><title type='text'>How to Effectively Campaign Online with Web Ads</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Some Do’s and Don’ts of online campaigning.Our friends at Spot-On recently sent an email blast about effectively campaigning online.  One important aspect was how to effectively use web ads.  In a post on their company blog, they point out the “Do’s and Don’ts” of using web ads:DO start early.Online advertising can be used for a variety of purposes - early fundraising, field organizing, </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=5147295283444248692' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/5147295283444248692'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/5147295283444248692'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/how-to-effectively-campaign-online-with.html' title='How to Effectively Campaign Online with Web Ads'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-6100090299234885975</id><published>2010-01-04T11:59:00.007-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-04T13:23:24.965-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='elections'/><title type='text'>10 Things to Watch for in 2010</title><summary type='text'>With 2009 over and a midterm election just 11 months away, pundits will be commenting on every imaginable issue over the year.  Most of this you can probably ignore, but there are 10 things to keep your eye on in '10.1) Jobs, Jobs, and Jobs.  With only a few small dips here and there, unemployment steadily went up in 2009.  The majority of Americans said at the beginning of Obama's term that </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=6100090299234885975' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/6100090299234885975'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/6100090299234885975'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/10-things-to-watch-for-in-2010.html' title='10 Things to Watch for in 2010'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-1761903230696698682</id><published>2009-12-22T12:46:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-22T12:54:30.262-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='holiday'/><title type='text'>Happy Holidays 2009!</title><summary type='text'>Thank you for your continued reading!  We've sure had a great year.We’ll be taking a break here at WAYLA until January 4th, to spend the holidays with family and friends.We hope you have a happy holiday season, and we’ll see you again in the New Year.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=1761903230696698682' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1761903230696698682'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1761903230696698682'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/happy-holidays-2009.html' title='Happy Holidays 2009!'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/SzEVzcC33XI/AAAAAAAAAYU/4AVBmoopFOY/s72-c/holidays.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2129216815670507334</id><published>2009-12-21T12:43:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-21T13:05:56.361-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2009'/><title type='text'>2009: A Year in Review</title><summary type='text'>Summary: 2009 was a transition year in politics. Now we wait to see how it will affect 2010.2009 was truly an interesting year to observe as the nation transitioned out of the Bush Era and into the Obama years.The year was marked by three issues: the economy, healthcare reform, and the war in Afghanistan.  Occasionally we came across other issues including the torture debate, gay marriage, and </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2129216815670507334' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2129216815670507334'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2129216815670507334'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/2009-year-in-review.html' title='2009: A Year in Review'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/Sy_D1QPZm-I/AAAAAAAAAYM/eDj7fpvQdgA/s72-c/2009+political+images.bmp' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-4258653785782858625</id><published>2009-12-19T14:22:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-19T14:32:03.029-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hollywood Does Politics'/><title type='text'>Hollywood Does Politics: A Conclusion</title><summary type='text'>Thanks to everyone who kept up with our fourth series, "Hollywood Does Politics" - we hope you've enjoyed it.So what did we learn?For starters, accuracy isn't the first concern Hollywood has when making poltical movies - entertainment is.  We also found out that so far political movies tend to lean left more often than right.The last thing we discovered was exactly what made a good political </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=4258653785782858625' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4258653785782858625'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4258653785782858625'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/hollywood-does-politics-conclusion.html' title='Hollywood Does Politics: A Conclusion'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-8010861026639701936</id><published>2009-12-18T14:42:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-18T15:11:59.231-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hollywood Does Politics'/><title type='text'>The Top 5 Political Campaign Movies</title><summary type='text'>Part 5 of our 5-part series: “Hollywood Does Politics”It’s finally here: our Top 5 fictional movies about political campaigns!  Before we tell you all about them, let’s go over how we came up with the list.First, the movies cannot be a documentary.  We already listed our top 5 political campaign documentaries last week.  Second, it has to be about campaigns.  While “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=8010861026639701936' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8010861026639701936'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8010861026639701936'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/top-5-political-campaign-movies.html' title='The Top 5 Political Campaign Movies'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/SyvrwQ5jYQI/AAAAAAAAAYA/IMfaskCQGdk/s72-c/five+political+campaign+movies.bmp' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-1980498315037934510</id><published>2009-12-17T11:59:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-17T12:01:12.876-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Democrats'/><title type='text'>More on the Democratic Base Discontent</title><summary type='text'>There was a good discussion on “Morning Joe” today that provides some food-for-thought regarding our recent post on the unrest in the Democratic base.Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economyDon’t forget, tomorrow is our final segment of “Hollywood Does Politics!”  We’ll be bringing you our Top 5 Political Campaign Movies, but we want to hear from you too.Email us </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=1980498315037934510' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1980498315037934510'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1980498315037934510'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/more-on-democratic-base-discontent.html' title='More on the Democratic Base Discontent'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-7648694205216150305</id><published>2009-12-16T11:10:00.007-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-16T11:26:22.263-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Senate'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Joe Lieberman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Democrats'/><title type='text'>Will Progressives Backlash Over Healthcare Reform?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: With Lieberman holding up the Senate healthcare bill, Democrats need to explore their options looking forward to 2010.Every liberal in the country following the ongoing healthcare debate is furious.  Much of this anger is directed at one man in particular: Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CT).After Senate Democrats met to reach a compromise bill that could pass the 60-vote threshold for cloture,</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=7648694205216150305' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7648694205216150305'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/7648694205216150305'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/will-progressives-backlash-over.html' title='Will Progressives Backlash Over Healthcare Reform?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/SykWqdCdNQI/AAAAAAAAAX4/IzIA8nzUU_k/s72-c/Lieberman+goofy.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-1297449415677637792</id><published>2009-12-15T15:16:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-15T15:40:43.673-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hollywood Does Politics'/><title type='text'>When Hollywood Gets It Wrong</title><summary type='text'>Part 4 of our 5-part series: “Hollywood Does Politics”It would be impossible to watch every political movie ever produced and list every mistake Hollywood has ever made.  So we decided to look at three films and show you some common errors that can be seen in fictional political movies.“Swing Vote” (2008)In this comedy-drama about a non-political working-class New Mexican, Bud Johnson (Kevin </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=1297449415677637792' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1297449415677637792'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1297449415677637792'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/when-hollywood-gets-it-wrong.html' title='When Hollywood Gets It Wrong'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/Syf_bRnjwVI/AAAAAAAAAXY/mArDCWpSj0c/s72-c/Swing+Vote.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-353799279334241038</id><published>2009-12-14T11:24:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-14T12:00:18.569-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Conservative Protests'/><title type='text'>Splits in the Tea Party Movement</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Will the feuds between Tea Party factions make it a less-effective movement?An interesting article in the Huffington Post on Friday finds that there appears to be a feud between two or more Tea Party factions.It all began when a co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots - Amy Kremer - decided to join a group called the Tea Party Express, a project of the Our Country Deserves Better PAC which </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=353799279334241038' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/353799279334241038'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/353799279334241038'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/splits-in-tea-party-movement.html' title='Splits in the Tea Party Movement'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-4944328813546788012</id><published>2009-12-11T12:37:00.010-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-12T00:05:42.165-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hollywood Does Politics'/><title type='text'>The Best Campaign Documentaries</title><summary type='text'>Part 3 of our 5-part series: "Hollywood Does Politics"On Tuesday, we’ll be showing you cases in which Hollywood fiction yields error on the subject of political campaigns.  But what kinds of movies are going to show campaigning most accurately?  Documentaries, of course.Here are five of our favorite political campaign documentaries…“The War Room” (1993)“The War Room” takes an in depth and </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=4944328813546788012' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4944328813546788012'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4944328813546788012'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/best-campaign-documentaries.html' title='The Best Campaign Documentaries'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/SyKXdgfO53I/AAAAAAAAAWw/SBws_SE324A/s72-c/War+room.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-5112591923082846375</id><published>2009-12-10T10:42:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-10T11:09:58.246-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='global warming'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='message'/><title type='text'>More on Climate Change and Jobs</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Job creation motivates Americans to support renewable energy policy by large margins.Too bad we missed this for our post yesterday.  A new McClatchy-Ipsos poll released yesterday finds that Americans are much more willing to pay to avert climate change if it creates new green jobs.One sample of respondents was asked if they would support cap-and-trade legislation if it raised their </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=5112591923082846375' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/5112591923082846375'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/5112591923082846375'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/more-on-climate-change-and-jobs.html' title='More on Climate Change and Jobs'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/SyErSW1SKoI/AAAAAAAAAWo/PO_6Vmul_mQ/s72-c/cap-and-trade+jobs.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-163886160205999640</id><published>2009-12-09T13:06:00.007-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-09T14:49:05.186-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='global warming'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Sarah Palin'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='message'/><title type='text'>Palin, Climate Change and Copenhagen: It’s Really About Jobs</title><summary type='text'>Summary: "Palin might complain that global warming believers are killing the economy, but in fact it’s far from the truth."In an op-ed piece in today’s Washington Post, former Alaska governor and vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin criticized the climate change conference in Copenhagen as a political event.From her op-ed:In his inaugural address, President Obama President Obama declared his </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=163886160205999640' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/163886160205999640'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/163886160205999640'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/palin-climate-change-and-copenhagen-its.html' title='Palin, Climate Change and Copenhagen: It’s Really About Jobs'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/Sx_2utyvVOI/AAAAAAAAAWE/XHdMvfX9-KA/s72-c/smoke-stack.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-4255726807064037359</id><published>2009-12-08T11:51:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-08T12:04:39.618-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hollywood Does Politics'/><title type='text'>Do Political Movies Lean Right or Left?</title><summary type='text'>Part 2 of our 5-part series: Hollywood Does PoliticsBefore we tell you our Top 5 Political Campaign Movies next week, we want to ask an important question that could influence our list: what are the agendas?Are their even any agendas to these movies?  If so, are they conservative or liberal?Everyone knows that Hollywood is pretty liberal.  Movie stars like Tom Hanks, Brad Pitt, Sarah Jessica </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=4255726807064037359' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4255726807064037359'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4255726807064037359'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/do-political-movies-lean-right-or-left.html' title='Do Political Movies Lean Right or Left?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/Sx6S3_nlIkI/AAAAAAAAAV8/SvIDHAbCBrs/s72-c/sarah+jessica+parker+Obama.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-5992901542092087739</id><published>2009-12-07T12:01:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-07T12:10:48.058-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='new-media'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fundraising'/><title type='text'>An eBay Tool Politicos Could Use</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Using business tools for campaigning - how interactive maps can increase momentum.Advancements in political technology can come from just about anywhere.  Every once in a while a new development from private enterprises can prove to be valuable resources for campaigns and political consultants.On Black Friday, eBay tracked their sales by location across the country and developed a very </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=5992901542092087739' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/5992901542092087739'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/5992901542092087739'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/ebay-tool-politicos-could-use.html' title='An eBay Tool Politicos Could Use'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/Sx1DoAHgm3I/AAAAAAAAAV0/uIu-3_VwLN0/s72-c/black+friday+ebay.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2074022577106072215</id><published>2009-12-04T14:31:00.007-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-04T14:49:31.134-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hollywood Does Politics'/><title type='text'>Campaigns on TV</title><summary type='text'>Part 1 of our 5-part series: “Hollywood Does Politics”It would be impossible to cover every television show that has ever tried to portray a political campaign, but today we’ll give you a synopsis of the campaigns on some of the most popular programs over the past decade.“The Wire” - Season 4 (HBO)At the end of “The Wire’s” third season, Councilman Tommy Carcetti makes the decision to run for </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2074022577106072215' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2074022577106072215'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2074022577106072215'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/campaigns-on-tv.html' title='Campaigns on TV'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/Sxl1ETQMiTI/AAAAAAAAAVM/cOospyPBEYE/s72-c/wire+carcetti.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-748450846303927229</id><published>2009-12-03T10:32:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-03T10:36:27.633-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hollywood Does Politics'/><title type='text'>Hollywood Does Politics: A New Series</title><summary type='text'>It’s December, and that means the holiday season has officially begun.  So we thought we’d do something fun for the blog and bring you our fourth series: Hollywood Does Politics!Over the next few weeks, we’ll bring you five posts discussing some of the best - and worst - movies and television shows involving campaign politics.  Of course, the movies don’t always give a realistic portrayal of </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=748450846303927229' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/748450846303927229'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/748450846303927229'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/hollywood-does-politics-new-series.html' title='Hollywood Does Politics: A New Series'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-4499370954904609831</id><published>2009-12-02T11:44:00.007-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-02T12:23:45.854-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Afghanistan'/><title type='text'>When Playing to the Middle Pleases Nobody</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Is Obama trying to appease both sides - or is the Afghanistan policy something other than a political decision?In his address to the cadets of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, and to the nation, President Obama outlined his new strategy for the war in Afghanistan.Along with announcing the deployment of an additional 30,000 troops to that country (75% of what General Stanley </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=4499370954904609831' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4499370954904609831'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4499370954904609831'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/when-playing-to-middle-pleases-nobody.html' title='When Playing to the Middle Pleases Nobody'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/SxarN0uoJ2I/AAAAAAAAAVE/o7b1p2hIkAY/s72-c/gallup+afghanistan+surge+by+party.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-5288370818723662714</id><published>2009-12-01T15:19:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-01T15:28:06.266-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='polls'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='economy'/><title type='text'>The Spending vs. Jobs Dilemma</title><summary type='text'>Summary: How Spending and Jobs have become both economic and political trade-offs.The Congressional Budget Office released a report last night revealing that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (better known as the stimulus package) has thus far saved as many as 1.6 million jobs.That should be good news for President Obama, but there are some problems associated with that figure.The first </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=5288370818723662714' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/5288370818723662714'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/5288370818723662714'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/spending-vs-jobs-dilemma.html' title='The Spending vs. Jobs Dilemma'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/SxWKCyRKuCI/AAAAAAAAAU8/eXqpwJrCaWI/s72-c/unemployment+and+obama' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-8991504679313992475</id><published>2009-11-24T16:27:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-11-24T16:29:59.741-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='holiday'/><title type='text'>Happy Thanksgiving Week!</title><summary type='text'>We're taking the week off this week to celebrate Turkey Day.See you Monday!</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=8991504679313992475' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8991504679313992475'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8991504679313992475'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/11/happy-thanksgiving-week.html' title='Happy Thanksgiving Week!'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/SwxeGCrWeyI/AAAAAAAAAU0/BDpzrBeflyk/s72-c/thanksgiving.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-1795532812952364913</id><published>2009-11-19T15:32:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-11-19T15:47:26.357-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='NRCC'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='GOP'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Democrats'/><title type='text'>Where Will the GOP Make Gains in 2010?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Should Republicans target conservative rural districts or moderate suburban districts?Assuming the Republicans pick up a few seats in Congress next year, what kind of districts can we expect them to pick up?Based on recent ad buys from the NRCC, it seems that Republicans believe the seats they pick up will be from more rural areas in traditionally red states.  Recently they released this</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=1795532812952364913' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1795532812952364913'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1795532812952364913'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/11/where-will-gop-make-gains-in-2010.html' title='Where Will the GOP Make Gains in 2010?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-6004088584160201586</id><published>2009-11-18T16:33:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2009-11-18T16:37:05.040-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='foreign politics'/><title type='text'>American Political Consultants in Foreign Races</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Profits and limited liability drive some of America's top political consultants to go international.Ever wonder why the really well-known political consultants - the James Carvilles, Mark Penns, etc. - go overseas for work?  Ever wonder why foreign campaigns hire them?There’s an interesting article in Politico today which covers these very questions.From the article:In Kiev and Kharkiv </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=6004088584160201586' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/6004088584160201586'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/6004088584160201586'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/11/american-political-consultants-in.html' title='American Political Consultants in Foreign Races'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2497350942907378021</id><published>2009-11-17T16:48:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-11-17T16:52:29.837-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='independents'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='third parties'/><title type='text'>Interesting Finding on Third Party Support</title><summary type='text'>It’s been something of a slow news day today for electoral politics, but we did happen to catch an interesting figure in the latest report from the Pew Research Center.Apparently, despite all the new stories about independents and third party candidates running for office, support for them is - on the whole - decreasing.From the report:Despite record dissatisfaction with Congress and extremely </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2497350942907378021' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2497350942907378021'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2497350942907378021'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/11/interesting-finding-on-third-party.html' title='Interesting Finding on Third Party Support'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/SwMony6ABTI/AAAAAAAAAUs/jNQ_qwe5DlQ/s72-c/third+party+decline.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2524218542798983256</id><published>2009-11-16T15:57:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-11-16T16:02:40.690-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2012'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Sarah Palin'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Presidency'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='GOP'/><title type='text'>Could Sarah Palin Make a Comeback in 2012?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: How political processes could lead to President Palin in 2012.Now that her new book is coming out, a lot of pundits are talking about a possible Sarah Palin comeback and an eventual 2012 GOP presidential nomination.David Brooks - the conservative columnist who has spoken less than highly of Palin in the past - had this to say on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday:“She’s a joke.  I mean, I just </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2524218542798983256' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2524218542798983256'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2524218542798983256'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/11/could-sarah-palin-make-comeback-in-2012.html' title='Could Sarah Palin Make a Comeback in 2012?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/SwHLsf_nLHI/AAAAAAAAAUk/CktwMKwtGMI/s72-c/sarah-palin-going-rogue-book-cover.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-691736507033617116</id><published>2009-11-13T13:20:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-11-13T13:24:15.539-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='GOP'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Democrats'/><title type='text'>Top 5 Things Republicans and Democrats Must Do in 2010</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Both parties will be facing tough battles for their seats in 2010. Here are the top five things for each party to pay attention to going into election season.Yesterday I went through the data and analysis of the new Gallup poll which found the GOP to be leading the Democrats on the generic ballot, and the most recent Cook Political Report ratings.As promised, I’m using our analysis to </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=691736507033617116' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/691736507033617116'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/691736507033617116'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/11/top-5-things-republicans-and-democrats.html' title='Top 5 Things Republicans and Democrats Must Do in 2010'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-8489761020457628461</id><published>2009-11-12T15:38:00.009-06:00</published><updated>2009-11-12T16:04:20.000-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='gubernatorial races'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Congress'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2010'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='polls'/><title type='text'>New Data and Analysis for the 2010 Elections</title><summary type='text'>Summary: WAYLA looks through the recent trends and makes a few 2010 predictions.Like everyone else has been doing, I thought I’d use today to review the updates from the Cook Political Report and the recent Gallup poll that find Republicans gaining popularity.First, the Gallup findings…And it shouldn’t be any real surprise that much of the GOP gains are due to increasing support among </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=8489761020457628461' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8489761020457628461'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8489761020457628461'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-data-and-analysis-for-2010.html' title='New Data and Analysis for the 2010 Elections'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/SvyCiOjJLYI/AAAAAAAAAUE/0UT2IqlBKTE/s72-c/2010+GOP+-+independents.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-926111779938921681</id><published>2009-11-11T13:20:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-11-11T13:25:32.773-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Jon Stewart'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Fox News'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='campaign finance'/><title type='text'>Fox News Fabricates Story for GOP Gains</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Could Fox News be in violation of campaign finance law?Some of you who read the title of this post probably said “duh” - but a recent clip from their broadcast was picked up by the Daily Show last night, revealing that Sean Hannity literally showed false footage to make a recent Tea Party protest look bigger than it was.The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10cSean Hannity </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=926111779938921681' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/926111779938921681'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/926111779938921681'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/11/fox-news-fabricates-story-for-gop-gains.html' title='Fox News Fabricates Story for GOP Gains'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-3624727101928957870</id><published>2009-11-10T16:51:00.009-06:00</published><updated>2009-11-10T17:03:12.573-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Afghanistan'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='polls'/><title type='text'>How Afghan Opinion Weighs on Obama’s Options</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Three things Obama should know before making strategy decisions for the Afghan WarAfter Dr. Abdullah Abdullah exited the run-off election for the Afghan presidency, President Barack Obama called on incumbent Afghan President Hamid Karzai to bring a “new chapter” in his country’s history.Not only is it important for Afghans, but also for American interests as the Obama Administration </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=3624727101928957870' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/3624727101928957870'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/3624727101928957870'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/11/how-afghan-opinion-weighs-on-obamas.html' title='How Afghan Opinion Weighs on Obama’s Options'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/SvnvmKEZx9I/AAAAAAAAATM/y6aE7f84QNk/s72-c/afghan+opinion+surge.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2306321069331862378</id><published>2009-11-09T15:17:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-11-09T15:25:35.471-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Conservative Protests'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Marco Rubio'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='GOP'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Florida'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Charlie Crist'/><title type='text'>Far-Right Splitting from GOP</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Are Republicans becoming more vulnerable as far-right leaners move away from the GOP?A number of stories in Politico today suggest that the far-right of the Republican base is now either leaving the GOP, or at least leaving it more vulnerable for 2010.  This comes despite the recent election of Democrat Bill Owens in New York’s 23rd Congressional District where a Conservative Party </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2306321069331862378' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2306321069331862378'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2306321069331862378'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/11/far-right-splitting-from-gop.html' title='Far-Right Splitting from GOP'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/SviIWCUd7UI/AAAAAAAAATE/kSSi7tawIfU/s72-c/right+wing+extremist.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-8764834490300134258</id><published>2009-11-06T15:14:00.006-06:00</published><updated>2009-11-06T18:31:01.301-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Conservative Protests'/><title type='text'>Tea Party Protesters Getting Out of Hand</title><summary type='text'>Summary: The Tea Party activists and their latest protest - how it crossed the line.While the nation mourns the tragic loss of our men and women at Ft. Hood this week, an interesting secondary story has been circling the blogosphere - hateful messages coming from Tea Party protesters, and what appears to be encouragement from GOP leaders.From an editorial in Politics Daily:When John Boehner, the </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=8764834490300134258' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8764834490300134258'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8764834490300134258'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/11/tea-party-protesters-getting-out-of.html' title='Tea Party Protesters Getting Out of Hand'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/SvSSxjbPN1I/AAAAAAAAAS8/6zGmMM35zRU/s72-c/anti-obama+protester.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-6237826171230449739</id><published>2009-11-05T13:57:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-11-05T14:09:24.956-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='campaign finance'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Michael Bloomberg'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='New York City'/><title type='text'>Was Bloomberg’s Campaign Spending “Worth It?”</title><summary type='text'>Summary: After spending nearly $100 million we can now ask how much is too much to spend on a campaign.It was well noted in last year’s presidential election that the Obama campaign spent about $730 million to put the junior Illinois senator in the White House while earning about 69.5 million votes - in other words, they spent about $10.50 per vote.It may not have come from Obama himself, but it </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=6237826171230449739' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/6237826171230449739'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/6237826171230449739'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/11/was-bloombergs-campaign-spending-worth.html' title='Was Bloomberg’s Campaign Spending “Worth It?”'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/SvMvFpQKIrI/AAAAAAAAAS0/z1igiIew3Wc/s72-c/bloomberg+smiling.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-4402629954787633712</id><published>2009-11-04T13:19:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2009-11-04T13:30:32.942-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2009'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='special election'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Creigh Deeds'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Bill Thompson'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Bob McDonnell'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='New York State'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Michael Bloomberg'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='New York City'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Chris Christie'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Jon Corzine'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Virginia'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='elections'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='New Jersey'/><title type='text'>Final Thoughts on Yesterday’s Elections</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Dave at WAYLA reviews the November 2009 elections and their implications.First I want to start by looking back on my predictions from Monday.  In Virginia I said McDonnell would win handedly against Deeds, and he did.  In fact, he won with 59% of the vote - 2% more than I expected.   In New Jersey, I wrongly suggested Corzine could squeak in a victory, and no matter who won it would be </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=4402629954787633712' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4402629954787633712'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/4402629954787633712'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/11/final-thoughts-on-yesterdays-elections.html' title='Final Thoughts on Yesterday’s Elections'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/SvHV2gVK_OI/AAAAAAAAASk/HRzR5P9tk0o/s72-c/nov+2009+victories.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-2248270147905178633</id><published>2009-11-03T12:23:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-11-03T12:47:37.879-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2009'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Virginia'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='New Jersey'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='New York State'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Maine'/><title type='text'>Happy Election Day 2009</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Happy Election Day - will political predictions come true?It’s the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November - and although it’s not an even-numbered year this year, today is still Election Day.Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the EconomyWith polls closing in Maine, New York, New Jersey, and Virginia in less than 12 hours we thought we’d bring you some</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=2248270147905178633' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2248270147905178633'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/2248270147905178633'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/11/happy-election-day-2009.html' title='Happy Election Day 2009'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/SvB2185HbrI/AAAAAAAAASc/eGgCFxp9LD4/s72-c/Election+Day+button.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-8631985769276592966</id><published>2009-11-02T15:48:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2009-11-02T15:59:56.174-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Chris Christie'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2009'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Jon Corzine'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Bill Thompson'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='New Jersey'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Maine'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Michael Bloomberg'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='gay marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='New York City'/><title type='text'>Predictions for Tomorrow’s Elections</title><summary type='text'>Tomorrow is Election Day for residents in New Jersey, Virginia, Maine, New York City, and New York’s 23rd Congressional District.  Last week we analyzed the gubernatorial race in Virginia and found Republican Bob McDonnell to be the likely winner.Today we take a look at the big races in the other four elections.New JerseyBig Race: GovernorCandidates: Jon Corzine (D), Chris Christie (R), Chris </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=8631985769276592966' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8631985769276592966'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/8631985769276592966'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/11/predictions-for-tomorrows-elections.html' title='Predictions for Tomorrow’s Elections'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6250511782043846823.post-1580560155981708429</id><published>2009-10-29T14:52:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2009-10-29T15:00:22.783-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='lobbying'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='global warming'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='polls'/><title type='text'>Why Do Fewer Americans Believe in Global Warming?</title><summary type='text'>Summary: Just more than one third of Americans believe climate change is caused by humans these days, but what - or who - is to blame?According to a Pew Center report released last week, only 57% of Americans believe that there is solid evidence that the earth is warming - down a staggering 14% since April 2008 - and just 36% believe global warming is both real and caused by humans.Every </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6250511782043846823&amp;postID=1580560155981708429' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1580560155981708429'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6250511782043846823/posts/default/1580560155981708429'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://whatareyoulookingatpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/10/why-do-fewer-americans-believe-in.html' title='Why Do Fewer Americans Believe in Global Warming?'/><author><name>Dave</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_T84hsuYO4js/Sunz1s8Lx3I/AAAAAAAAASU/frQTVrmhbsg/s72-c/global+warming+party+lines.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
